PEO Comparisons
The critical difference: a PEO co-employs your workforce, unlocking group benefits and workers' comp savings unavailable to individual small businesses. An ASO provides HR administration without co-employment — and without those savings.
Talk to a PEO ExpertBoth PEOs and ASOs help businesses manage HR administration — but the underlying structure is fundamentally different, and that difference has major financial implications for small businesses.
A PEO enters a co-employment arrangement with the client. By becoming the employer of record for tax and benefits purposes, the PEO can pool thousands of employees across its entire client base. This pooling creates the purchasing power of a large corporation — enabling small businesses to access group health insurance rates, group workers' comp rates, and Fortune 500-level benefits that would otherwise be unavailable to them.
An ASO (Administrative Services Organization) provides the same HR administration services — payroll processing, compliance support, employee handbook development — but without co-employment. The client remains the sole employer. This means the client does not gain access to the ASO's group benefits or workers' comp rates. The client must maintain its own benefits plans and workers' comp policy at individual market rates.
For most small businesses with fewer than 200 employees, the co-employment model of a PEO delivers significantly more value. The savings on workers' comp premiums and benefits costs typically more than offset the PEO fee. For larger businesses that already have competitive benefits and workers' comp rates through their own scale, an ASO may be a more cost-effective option for outsourcing HR administration.
| Feature | PEO | ASO |
|---|---|---|
| Co-employment arrangement | ||
| Employer of record for taxes | ||
| Group benefits access | ||
| Workers' comp at group rates | ||
| Payroll processing | ||
| HR compliance support | ||
| Employee handbook development | ||
| Client is sole employer | ||
| Client maintains own benefits plans | ||
| Best for 5–150 employees | 200+ |
The key difference is co-employment. A PEO enters a co-employment arrangement with the client, becoming the employer of record for tax and benefits purposes. This allows the PEO to offer group benefits and workers' comp at group rates. An ASO (Administrative Services Organization) provides HR administration services without co-employment — the client remains the sole employer and does not gain access to the PEO's group benefits or workers' comp rates.
For most small businesses, a PEO provides more value than an ASO because the co-employment model unlocks group benefits rates and workers' comp savings that are unavailable to individual small businesses. The ASO model makes more sense for larger businesses (typically 200+ employees) that already have competitive benefits and workers' comp rates but want to outsource HR administration.
No. An ASO does not provide workers' compensation coverage. The client business must maintain its own workers' comp policy. This is one of the primary advantages of a PEO over an ASO for small businesses — PEO clients access group workers' comp rates that can be 30–50% lower than individual market rates.
Get Started
Get a custom cost analysis and see exactly what KeyHR's PEO model would save your business.
Get a QuoteESAC-accredited, NAPEO-member, and serving Florida businesses for over 20 years. Get a custom analysis of what KeyHR's PEO model would save your business.
Get a Quote